Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU
Indian Highways Management Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Sowil Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. contract execution and disputes overview. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. arbitral tribunal's award findings. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 18) |
| 3. parties' arguments on interest claims. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 24 , 25) |
| 4. interpretation of msmed act provisions. (Para 23 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 31 , 32) |
| 5. interaction between msmed act and a&c act. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 44) |
| 6. dismissal of the petition. (Para 45 , 46) |
JUDGMENT
Vibhu Bakhru, J. (Oral)
1. The petitioner (hereafter `IHMCL') has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter `the A&C Act') impugning an arbitral award dated 11.10.2021 (hereafter `the impugned award') rendered by an Arbitral Tribunal constituted by Justice (Retired) Badar Durrez Ahmed as the Sole Arbitrator (hereafter `the Arbitral Tribunal').
2. The Arbitral Tribunal has rendered the impugned award in the context of disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to a contract dated 28.10.2014 for "Conducting Traffic Surveys on National Highways in Zone-5 (in the States of Odisha, West Bengal and North Eastern States) using Portable Automatic Traffic Co
The MSMED Act prevails over A&C Act provisions regarding interest, granting small enterprises specific rights on delayed payments independent of dispute resolution processes.
The court affirmed that failure to consider the MSMED Act's provisions on interest constitutes a significant error, leading to the setting aside of the arbitral award.
EM-II filing discretionary for micro/small enterprises beyond 180 days; MSMED reference limitation starts from buyer's post-investigation denial, not supply date; narrow Section 34 scope upholds awar....
If any registration under the MSMED Act is obtained, the same will be prospective and would apply to supply of goods and services subsequent to registration but cannot operate retrospectively. Accord....
The lack of conciliation does not undermine the statutory obligation to make payment under the MSMED Act, emphasizing the importance of adherence to payment timelines by the buyer.
The Court upheld the impugned Award and emphasized the finality of arbitral awards, reinforcing the limited grounds for challenging an award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
