IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
M.S. SONAK, KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
Shahid Akeel Shaikh – Petitioner
Versus
Union of India, through its Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 11807 of 2024
Decided On : 20-09-2024
Disability - Admission - Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 - The court emphasized the importance of reasonable accommodation and the right to education for persons with disabilities, allowing the petitioner’s admission despite an inadvertent error in the application process.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, suffering from a 40% locomotor disability, sought admission to an MBBS course under the PwD-OBC quota but faced issues due to an inadvertent error in his online application indicating he was not a PwD.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner was eligible for admission based on verified disability status and that the error in the application did not prejudice the admission process, thus allowing the provisional admission to be finalized.
Issues: Whether the inadvertent error in the online application form should disqualify the petitioner from admission to the MBBS course under the PwD-OBC quota.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the error was unintentional and did not affect the petitioner's eligibility, emphasizing the need for reasonable accommodation under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act.
Result: The court directed the confirmation of the petitioner's provisional admission to the MBBS course at Government Medical College, Kudal, Sindhudurg against the PwD-OBC quota.
JUDGMENT :
M.S. SONAK, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Rule. The rule is made returnable immediately at the request of and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties.
3. Even otherwise, by our orders dated 11 September 2024 and 19 September 2024, we had clarified that this matter would be disposed of finally at the admission stage, given the urgency involved.
4. The Petitioner, who suffers from a locomotor disability to the extent of 40%, seeks an appropriate writ from this Court to direct the Respondents to admit him to the MBBS course against the PwD-OBC (PH) quota.
5. After the institution of this Petition, the Petitioner, through legal aid, instituted Writ Petition (Civil) No. 552 of 2024 before the Hon’ble Supreme Court seeking similar relief. By order dated 6 September 2024, the Hon’ble Supreme Court relegated the Petitioner to this Court.
6. The order dated 6 September 2024 reads as follows:
2. Since the petition is pending before the High Court, we permit the Advocate for the petitioner to move the Registrar (Judicial) of the High Court, who may seek administrative directions from the learned Chief Justice for listing it before an appropriate Bench so that it can be taken up at an early date.
3. The Petition is accordingly disposed of.
4. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.”
7. This Petition was assigned by the Hon’ble Chief Justice to this Bench on 10 September 2024. Accordingly, we posted it on 11 September 2024 at 10:30 a.m. after duly notifying the same on the cause list.
8. On 11 September 2024, we granted the Petitioner leave to implead the State of Maharashtra, State Common Entrance Test Cell and All India Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (“AIIPMR”) as Respondents and directed the Petitioner to take immediate steps to serve these newly impleaded Respondents.
9. On 11 September 2024, we also made an interim order directing AIIPMR, one of the authorised and prescribed institutions for verifying disability status, especially of candidates afflicted with locomotor disabilities, to examine the Petitioner and verify the Petitioner’s disability status. The matter was posted on 19 September 2024, high on board, for final disposal.
10. The above interim relief was granted because the learned counsel for the Petitioner produced on record the ‘Provisional Selection Letter (CAP 1)’ issued by the State Common Entrance Test Cell, Maharashtra, printed on 1 September 2024 at 10:50 a.m. This Provisional Selection Letter states that the Petitioner was provisionally admitted to the MBBS course at Government Medical College, Kudal, Sindhudurg, against the PwD-OBC (PH) quota.
11. By notice dated 30 July 2024 (Exhibit ‘F’ on pages 21 to 23 of the paper book), all the children/widows of Armed Forces and Persons with Disabilities (CW & PwD) were advised to have ready their relevant documents to ensure their eligibility in the respective categories. The PwD candidates were directed to make appointments with any of the nearest/feasible centres out of the 16 notified centres listed in Annexure 1. For the Petitioner, who hails from Nashik, the two nearest/feasible disability certification centres were the AIIPMR, Mumbai, for locomotor disability only and Grant Government Medical College, J.J. Hospital Compound, for all disabilities as mentioned in disability certificate.
12. The Petitioner has pleaded that on 6 August 2024, the Petitioner personally visited the Grant Government Medical College, J.J. Hospital Compound, requesting that his disability position be certified. The Petitioner has also placed
Avni Prakash vs. National Testing Agency (NTA) and Others
The court established that inadvertent errors in application forms should not bar eligible candidates from admission, reinforcing the principles of reasonable accommodation for persons with disabilit....
The court upheld the validity of amended eligibility regulations for medical admissions requiring intact limbs and functional competency, emphasizing adherence to application timelines as lawful and ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of meeting the eligibility criteria, including the condition of both hands being intact with intact sensation, sufficient strength, ....
Exclusion from admission despite valid disability certification violates rights and mandates of reasonable accommodation under disability laws.
Disability quantification should not disqualify candidates from medical education; functional competency must be assessed for eligibility.
Meritorious candidates who have pursued their legal right expeditiously without delay and have been denied admission to MBBS Course illegally or irrationally by the authorities for no fault of theirs....
Quantified disability alone cannot disqualify candidates from educational opportunities; individual assessments must determine eligibility based on the ability to pursue the course.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.