Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV NARULA
Blue Heaven Cosmetics Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
T.R.N. Corporation – Respondent
ORDER
[VIA HYBRID MODE]
I.A. 13667/2021 (for exemption from exhausting the remedy of pre-institution mediation)
1. In the facts of the present case, the exemption sought from attempting pre-institution mediation, is allowed.
2. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.
I.A. 13666/2021 (for seeking extension of time for filing the court fee)
3. Counsel for the Plaintiff states that he will make up the deficiency in the Court Fees, within a period of three days from today. Taking the said statement on record, the application is allowed and disposed of.
I.A. 13665/2021 (for declaration of the copies of the documents filed along with the plaint)
4. The exempted documents shall be filed positively within a period of one week from today, in strict compliance with the practice rules of this Court.
5. With the aforesaid direction, the present application is allowed and disposed of.
I.A. 13664/2021 (under Order 11, Rule 1(4) of the COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT , 2015 r/w Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [`CPC'] seeking leave to file additional documents)
6. This is an application seeking leave to file additional documents at a later stage under the COMMERCIAL C
 |  |
 |  |
 |  |
A plaintiff must demonstrate a prima facie case of trademark infringement, supported by evidence of prior use and likelihood of consumer confusion to obtain an ex-parte injunction.
The court upheld that protecting registered trademarks from potentially infringing use requires establishing a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and potential for irreparable harm.
The court established that a prima facie case for relief exists when trademark infringement is evident, justifying ex parte interim injunction to prevent irreparable harm.
The court granted an ad-interim injunction for trademark and copyright infringement upon finding a prima facie case of passing off by the defendants, who adopted a deceptively similar mark subsequent....
The court affirmed that trademark owners are entitled to an interim injunction against unauthorized similar use that may confuse consumers, prioritizing the prevention of irreparable harm over potent....
Trademark infringement and passing off claims were established due to the unauthorized use of a competitor's trademark, justifying ex-parte injunction and domain suspension.
Trademark law recognizes the importance of avoiding consumer confusion between similar marks, especially in pharmaceuticals, while encouraging mediation to resolve disputes.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
