SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT BANSAL
Rica S.P.A. – Appellant
Versus
Skin Safe Industries – Respondent


Table of Content
1. plaintiff granted time for additional documents (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. extension for furnishing court fees allowed (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. exemptions for filing documents granted (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
4. court's final orders and directions (Para 11 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30)
5. procedural applications and timelines (Para 12)
6. procedure for suit registration and summons issuance (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
7. plaintiff claims trademark and copyright infringement (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25)
8. prima facie case established for injunction (Para 31)
9. defendants restrained from trademark misuse (Para 32 , 33)

ORDER

[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

I.A.2045/2022 (u/O XI Rule 1(4) to file additional documents)

1. The present application filed on behalf of the plaintiff seeks leave to file additional documents under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

2. The plaintiff is granted thirty days' time to file additional documents.

3. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

I.A.2046/2022 (Extension of time in furnishing the court fee and to remit the court fee to SHCI)

4. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed.

5. The Stockholding Corporation of




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top