IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Amit Bansal, J.
Rica S.P.A. - Appellant
Versus
Skin Safe Industries - Respondent
CS(COMM) 85 of 2022
Decided On : 07-02-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff granted time for additional documents (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. extension for furnishing court fees allowed (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. exemptions for filing documents granted (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. court's final orders and directions (Para 11 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 5. procedural applications and timelines (Para 12) |
| 6. procedure for suit registration and summons issuance (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. plaintiff claims trademark and copyright infringement (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 8. prima facie case established for injunction (Para 31) |
| 9. defendants restrained from trademark misuse (Para 32 , 33) |
ORDER
[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]
I.A.2045/2022 (u/O XI Rule 1(4) to file additional documents)
1. The present application filed on behalf of the plaintiff seeks leave to file additional documents under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
2. The plaintiff is granted thirty days' time to file additional documents.
3. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.
I.A.2046/2022 (Extension of time in furnishing the court fee and to remit the court fee to SHCI)
4. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed.
5. The Stockholding Corporation of India is directed to issue the e-court fees to the counsel for the plaintiff.
6. Upon making the necessary payment, the Court Fees and Process Fees be filed within four weeks from today.
7. The application stands disposed of.
I.A.2047/2022 (for exemption from filing original documents)
8. Subject to the plaintiff filing original documents on which it may seek to place reliance, within four weeks from today, exemption is granted for the present.
9. The application is disposed of.
I.A.2048/2022 (for exemption from vernacular, legible copies of dim documents, certified copies of orders, true typed copies & left hand proper margin of documents)
10. Subject to the plaintiff filing vernacular, legible copies of dim documents, certified copies of orders, true typed copies & left hand proper margin of documents on which it may seek to place reliance, within four weeks from today, exemption is granted for the present.
11. The application is disposed of.
I.A.2049/2022 (for exemption from prior service to the defendant)
12. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed.
I.A.2050/2022 (for exemption from instituting pre-litigation mediation)
13. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed.
CS(COMM) 85/2022
14. Let the plaint be registered as a suit.
15. Summons be issued to the defendants through all permissible modes.
16. The summons shall state that the written statement(s) shall be filed by the defendants within thirty days from the date of the receipt of summons. Along with the written statement(s), the defendants shall also file an affidavit of admission/denial of the documents of the plaintiff, without which the written statement(s) shall not be taken on record.
17. Liberty is given to the plaintiff to file replication(s), if any, within fifteen days from the receipt of the written statement(s). Along with the replication(s) filed by the plaintiff, an affidavit of admission/denial of the documents of the defendants, be filed by the plaintiff.
18. The parties shall file all original documents in support of their respective claims along with their respective pleadings. In case parties are placing reliance on a document, which is not in their power and possession, its detail and source shall be mentioned in the list of reliance, which shall be also filed with the pleadings.
19. If any of the parties wish to seek inspection of any documents, the same shall be sought and given within the timelines.
20. List before the Joint Registrar on 11th April, 2022 for completion of service, pleadings, admission and denial of documents and marking of exhibits.
21. List before the Court on 07th July, 2022 for framing of issues.
I.A.2044/2022 (u/O XXXIX R-1 & 2)
22. The present suit has been filed on beha
![]() | ![]() | |
![]() | ![]() | |
![]() | ![]() |
The court established that a prima facie case for relief exists when trademark infringement is evident, justifying ex parte interim injunction to prevent irreparable harm.
A plaintiff must demonstrate a prima facie case of trademark infringement, supported by evidence of prior use and likelihood of consumer confusion to obtain an ex-parte injunction.
The court upheld that protecting registered trademarks from potentially infringing use requires establishing a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and potential for irreparable harm.
The court affirmed that trademark owners are entitled to an interim injunction against unauthorized similar use that may confuse consumers, prioritizing the prevention of irreparable harm over potent....
Plaintiff established a prima facie case for trademark and copyright infringement, necessitating an interim injunction to prevent consumer confusion and irreparable harm.
The court granted an ad-interim injunction for trademark and copyright infringement upon finding a prima facie case of passing off by the defendants, who adopted a deceptively similar mark subsequent....
Trademark law recognizes the importance of avoiding consumer confusion between similar marks, especially in pharmaceuticals, while encouraging mediation to resolve disputes.
The court established that the use of a similar mark that may cause consumer confusion constitutes trademark infringement and passing off, affirming the Plaintiff's exclusive rights over its register....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.