IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Narula, J.
Esme Consumer Private Limited - Appellant
Versus
Prass Naturaceutical Pvt. Ltd. - Respondent
CS(COMM) 88 of 2022
Decided On : 07-02-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's orders on process and compliance. (Para 10 , 25 , 26) |
| 2. registration of plaint as suit. (Para 11) |
| 3. plaintiff's registered trademarks and goodwill. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. arguments regarding the defendant's mark. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 5. court's injunction against defendant's mark. (Para 23 , 24) |
ORDER
I.A. 2087/2022 (u/Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking exemption from filing certain documents, clear copies and English translation)
1. Exemption is granted, subject to just exceptions.
2. The Petitioner shall file clearer copies of exempted documents, compliant with practice rules, before the next date of hearing.
3. The application stands disposed of.
I.A. 2088/2022 (u/O XI Rule 1(4) (as amended by the Commercial Courts, Act, 2015) read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking leave to file additional documents)
4. This is an application seeking leave to file additional documents under Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
5. The Plaintiffs, if they wish to file additional documents at a later stage, shall do so strictly as per the provisions of the Commercial Courts Act.
6. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.
I.A. 2089/2022 (u/S 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 read with Order XI Rule 6(3) Commercial Court Act, 2015 for declaration of the copies of the documents filed along with the plaint)
7. Exemption is granted, subject to just exceptions.
8. The Petitioner is exempted from filing the original documents at this stage and shall file the same on or before the next date of hearing.
9. The application stands disposed of.
I.A. 2090/2022 (u/Section 12 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 read with Section 151 of the CPC, 1908 for exemption from exhausting the remedy of pre-institution mediation)
10. Issue notice to the Defendant, by all permissible modes, upon filing of process fee, returnable on 04th July, 2022.
CS(COMM) 88/2022
11. Let the plaint be registered as a suit.
12. Upon filing of process fee, issue summons to the Defendant by all permissible modes. Summons shall state that the written statement shall be filed by the Defendant within 30 days from the date of receipt of summons. Along with the written statement, the Defendant shall also file an affidavit of admission/denial of the documents of the Plaintiff, without which the written statement shall not be taken on record.
13. Liberty is given to the Plaintiff to file a replication within 15 days of the receipt of the written statement. Along with the replication, if any, filed by the Plaintiff, an affidavit of admission/denial of documents of the Defendant, be filed by the Plaintiff, without which the replication shall not be taken on record. If any of the parties wish to seek inspection of any documents, the same shall be sought and given within the timelines.
14. List before the Joint Registrar for marking of exhibits on 13th April, 2022. It is made clear that any party unjustifiably denying documents would be liable to be burdened with costs.
15. List before Court for framing of issues on 04th July, 2022.
I.A. 2086/2022 (u/O XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking interim injunction)
16. The Plaintiff has filed the present suit seeking an injunction against the infringement of its trademark/trade-dress/writing/style/colour combination/packaging/label/copyright, passing-off of goods, delivery up, rendition of accounts of profits along with further damages.
17. Plaintiff is the registered proprietor of the marks - "NATURE'S", "NATURE ESSENCE", "NATURE'S ESSENCE" and "
", and has registration for both word marks as well as logos.
18. The details of Plaintiff's registered marks are mentioned in paragraph no. 7 of the suit. The said registrations are valid, subsisting and in existence. Besides, Plaintiff also has the copyrights over the logo/label/device of "NATURE'S ESSENCE" as specified in paragraph no. 10 of the pl


The court upheld that protecting registered trademarks from potentially infringing use requires establishing a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and potential for irreparable harm.
The court established that prima facie evidence of trademark infringement justified an interim injunction to prevent irreparable harm to the Plaintiff.
A plaintiff must demonstrate a prima facie case of trademark infringement, supported by evidence of prior use and likelihood of consumer confusion to obtain an ex-parte injunction.
The court affirmed that trademark owners are entitled to an interim injunction against unauthorized similar use that may confuse consumers, prioritizing the prevention of irreparable harm over potent....
The court established that a prima facie case for relief exists when trademark infringement is evident, justifying ex parte interim injunction to prevent irreparable harm.
Trademark infringement and passing off claims were established due to the unauthorized use of a competitor's trademark, justifying ex-parte injunction and domain suspension.
Trademark law recognizes the importance of avoiding consumer confusion between similar marks, especially in pharmaceuticals, while encouraging mediation to resolve disputes.
The court directed parties to align trademark registrations with previously accepted settlement terms regarding trade dress and packaging, while facilitating the procedural filing of additional docum....
The court granted an ad-interim injunction for trademark and copyright infringement upon finding a prima facie case of passing off by the defendants, who adopted a deceptively similar mark subsequent....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.