SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Garg Builders – Appellant
Versus
Sidculconcor Infra Company Limited – Respondent


Table of Content
1. arbitration clause and invocation process (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. claims are arbitrable (Para 7)
3. appointment of arbitrator (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
4. disposition of the petition (Para 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

I.A. 2109/2022 (exemption)

1. Allowed, with direction to file requisite original documents, i.e. Agreement and other documents, as well as notarised/attested affidavit within six weeks.

2. Application is disposed of.

ARB.P. 152/2022

3. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking appointment of sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes inter-se the parties.

4. As per the averments made in the present petition, the petitioner entered into Agreements dated 31.03.2015 and 15.04.2015 with the respondent for the work of C/o Administrative Building, Business facilities, public utilities, transporters office, station building etc. including allied works at MMLP Pantnagar Uttarakhand for contractual tendered amount of Rs.13,35,74,774/-. The date of commencement & completion of work was 31.03.2015 and 12.03.2016, which was respectively stipulated in the Award Letter. The work was duly compl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top