SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, SAURABH BANERJEE
George Emmanuel – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioners seeking pro-rata pension benefits. (Para 1 , 2)
2. entitlement to pro-rata pension under specific rules. (Para 3)
3. disposition of the petition and applications. (Para 4 , 7)
4. court's direction to consider and release pension. (Para 5 , 6)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The petitioners have filed the present petition seeking a writ of mandamus for directing the respondents to grant pro-rata pension in their favour from the date of their discharge with all consequential benefits along with interest @14% in terms of judgment dated 09.01.2016 in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2016 titled as Govind Kumar Srivastava Vs. Union of India & Ors. and judgment dated 24.11.2020 in W.P.(C) No.98/2020 titled as Brijal Kumar & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors..

2. According to the facts of the present petition, petitioners after enrolling in Indian Air Force on different dates underwent the required training successfully and stood discharged from the services of IAF on different dates after rendering different periods of regular service. The details whereof, qua each of the petitioners, are enumerated hereunder:

PETITIONER NUMBER AND NAMEDATE OF ENROLMENT IN IAFDATE OF DISCHARGE FROM IAFPER

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top