Sravan Bagaria vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER, TALWANT SINGH
Sravan Bagaria – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Table of Content
1. court's order procedures and tribunal's interim order (Para 1)
2. final order and remanding to tribunal for decision (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)

JUDGMENT

[Physical Court Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request]

Rajiv Shakdher, J. (Oral)--Pursuant to our last order dated 21.01.2022, Mr Vikram Jetly, who appears on behalf of respondent nos.1 and 2/UOI, has reverted with instructions.

1.1. Mr Jetly says that he would have no objection, if the matter is remanded to the Central Administrative Tribunal [in short "the Tribunal"] for a decision on merits.

1.2. For the purposes of convenience and completeness, the order dated 21.01.2022 is extracted hereafter:

"1. This writ petition is directed against an interlocutory order dated 24.12.2021, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal [in short, the "Tribunal"] in OA No.2978/2021.

1.1. Concededly, the aforesaid order is passed qua the interim relief that the petitioners had sought in the O.A.

1.2. A perusal of the impugned order shows that, in the first instance i.e., on 22.12.2021, the Tribunal had directed maintenance of status quo vis-a-vis the petitioners. This order was, however, vacated, via the impugned order.

1.3.