SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
LG Electronics India Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenge to tax rate application (Para 1 , 2)
2. rectification of intimation process (Para 3)
3. direction to process refund (Para 4)
4. disposal of writ petition (Para 5)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--Present writ petition has been filed challenging the intimation dated 31st March, 2021, issued under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (`Act'). In the alternative, Petitioner seeks a direction to the Respondents to dispose-of the application dated 14th April, 2021, filed under Section 154 of the Act, seeking rectification of the impugned intimation.

2. In the present writ petition, it has been averred that though the Petitioner had opted to be taxed under Section 115BAA of the Act, wherein tax rate of 22% has been prescribed, yet the Respondents by the impugned order has applied the tax rate of 25% as mandated under Section 115BA of the Act.

3. Today, Ms.Vibhooti Malhotra, learned counsel for the respondents, states that after taking the approval of Director of Income Tax, CPC, Bangalore the rectification rights in this case was reverted to CPC and rectification of intimation under Section 143(1) has been carried out. However, due to some technical reason

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top