SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER, JASMEET SINGH
Ashutosh Gautam – Appellant
Versus
Icar – Respondent


Table of Content
1. grounds for challenging tribunal's order (Para 2 , 3)
2. judicial observations on procedural lapses (Para 4)
3. remand for rehearing of the case (Para 5 , 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT

[Physical Court Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]

Rajiv Shakdher, J. (Oral)--Issue notice.

1.1. Mr. S.K. Gupta accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

2. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal, at this stage itself, based on the record presently available with the Court.

3. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 27.01.2022, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal [in short, the "Tribunal"] in O.A. No.179/2022.

3.1. Mr. M. K. Bhardwaj, who appears on behalf of the petitioner, says that the petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that the Tribunal has dismissed the aforesaid O.A. via the impugned order, simply, on the ground of limitation.

3.2. According to Mr. Bhardwaj, apart from anything else, there was a challenge in the O.A. to the order dated 12.07.2021 passed by respondent no.4 i.e., Chief Vigilance Officer, Indian Council of Agricultural Research [in short, "ICAR"], whereby the appointi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top