SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Rajiv Shakdher, Jasmeet Singh, JJ.
Ravinder Parkash Punj - Appellant
Versus
Neeraj Aggarwal - Respondent
FAO (COMM) 32 of 2022 & CM Appls. 10712-13 of 2022
Decided On : 02-03-2022




The court emphasized the necessity for expediting trial proceedings in CPC applications concerning judgments on admissions and interim relief, establishing clear timelines for evidence submission and trial conclusion.

Headnote:(A) Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order XII Rule 6, Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 - Appeal against order of Commercial Court concerning applications for judgment on admissions and interim relief - The court directed expedited trial, with specific timelines for filing affidavits of evidence and cross-examination. (Paras 2.1, 3.1)

Facts of the case:
This appeal arises from an application made by the appellant under the CPC, with the court discussing the lack of appeal against the rejection of the appellant's application and focusing on the directions regarding the respondent's application for interim relief.

Findings of Court:
Trial to be concluded by a specified date; directions for evidence were established, with adherence to the original order required during the suit's pendency.

Issues: The court framed the appeal's central issue around the procedural aspects of the CPC governing judgments on admissions and interim relief applications.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for expedited proceedings in the interest of justice and clarity, confirming that procedural rules allow for prompt resolution of matters brought before it.

Result: Appeal disposed of with specific directives.

Table of Content
1. rejection and scope of the appeal (Para 1 , 2)
2. survival of the appeal on specific orders (Para 3)
3. closure of pending applications (Para 4 , 5)

JUDGMENT

[Physical Court Hearing/ Hybrid Hearing (As per request)]

Rajiv Shakdher, J. (Oral):-Issue notice.

1.1. Mr Pramod Singhal accepts notice on behalf of respondent no.1.

2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 29.01.2022, passed by the learned District Judge (Commercial Court-03), Patiala House Courts, New Delhi.

2.1. Via order dated 29.01.2022, the learned District Judge has disposed of the appellant's application under Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short "CPC") as well as respondent no. 1's application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the CPC.

2.2. Mr Raman Gandhi, who appears on behalf of the appellant, fairly concedes that no appeal would lie against that part of the order dated 29.01.2022, whereby the appellant's application under Order XII Rule 6 of CPC was rejected.

2.3. Mr Gandhi, thus, says that this appeal should be treated as an appeal confined to the latter part of the impugned order, in which directions were issued on respondent no. 1's application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of CPC.

3. Concerning the aforesaid aspect of the matter, we have heard the counsel for the parties at some length.

3.1. Given the fact that the issues have been framed, counsel for the parties are agreed that the best way forward would be to expedite trial in the matter.

3.2. Accordingly, with the consent of counsel for the parties, the appeal is disposed of with the following directions.

(i) The appellant will file the affidavit(s) of evidence concerning his witness(es), within the next three [3] weeks.

(ii) Respondent no.1 will file the affidavit(s) of evidence of his witness(es), within three [3] weeks of the witness testimony(ies) being filed on behalf of the appellant.

(iii) Since we are told that respondent no. 2 has already been proceeded ex parte, no directions are issued qua respondent no. 2.

(iv). Once the affidavit of evidence of witness(es) is filed, the learned District Judge will fix the dates for cross-examination of witnesses.

(v) The aforesaid exercise will be completed, within the next ten [10] weeks.

(vi) The learned District Judge will endeavour to conclude the trial and render a judgment in the matter, on or before 31.05.2022.

(vi) Lastly, the appellant shall abide by the directions issued qua him via order dated 29.01.2022, during the pendency of the suit.

4. Parties will act based on the digitally signed copy of this order.

5. Consequently, pending applications shall stand closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top