SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Rajiv Shakdher, Talwant Singh, JJ.
Tata Sia Airlines Limited - Appellant
Versus
Frankfinn Aviation Services (Pvt.) Ltd. - Respondent
FAO(OS) (COMM) 33 of 2022 and FAO(OS) (COMM) 34 of 2022
Decided On : 09-02-2022




The court established procedural directives on filing replies to interlocutory applications to ensure timely adjudication without affecting final decisions.

Headnote:(A) Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order XXXIX Rules 1, 2, and 4 - Appeals directed against a common order regarding interlocutory applications - The court provided a timeline for filing replies and rejoinders to ensure timely adjudication of applications. The impugned order issued notice and allowed both parties to present their arguments. (Paras 1-3)

(B) Civil Procedure - Principles of interim relief - The court emphasized the process for adjudicating inter-party disputes through stipulated timelines and procedures.

Findings of Court:
The learned judge directed timely filing of replies and rejoinders concerning interlocutory applications while assuring no impact on the final decision in pending applications.

Issues: The primary issue was the procedural adherence to timelines in dealing with interlocutory applications.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the necessity for prompt hearing and consideration of applications while maintaining the current status of the pending matters.

Result: Appeals disposed of with directions for replies and rejoinders.

Table of Content
1. notice issued in interlocutory applications. (Para 1 , 2)
2. directions for filing of replies and rejoinders. (Para 3)
3. clarification on impact of order on pending applications. (Para 4)
4. closure of pending applications. (Para 5)

JUDGMENT

[Court hearing convened via video-conferencing on account of COVID-19]

Rajiv Shakdher, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. 7299/2022 in FAO(OS) (COMM) 33/2022

CM APPL. 7302/2022 in FAO(OS) (COMM) 34/2022

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

FAO(OS) (COMM) 33/2022 and CM APPLs. 7297-98/2022

FAO(OS) (COMM) 34/2022 and CM APPL. 7300-01/2022

2. inter alia, the above-captioned appeals are directed against the common order dated 02.02.2022, passed by the learned single judge in the appellant's application, preferred under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (in short `CPC') i.e., I.A. 1670/2022, and in respondent's application, filed under Order XXXIX Rule 2A of CPC i.e., I.A. 1795/2022. Both the applications have been preferred in a suit filed by the respondent i.e., CS(COMM) 54/2022.

2.1. Via the impugned order, the learned single judge has issued notice in the aforementioned interlocutory applications and given opportunity to the contesting side to file a reply. The applications have been listed by the learned single judge, on 07.03.2022.

3. Given the foregoing, counsels for the parties are agreed that the above-captioned appeals can be disposed of with the following directions:

(i) The respondent will file a reply to the appellant's application preferred under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of CPC i.e., I.A. No.1670/2022, within ten days from today. Rejoinder thereto, if any, will be filed by the appellant, within one week of the reply being served.

(ii) The appellant will file a reply to the respondent's application preferred under Order XXXIX Rule 2A of CPC i.e., I.A. No.1795/2022, within ten days from today. Rejoinder thereto, if any, will be filed by the respondent, within one week of the reply being served.

(iii) The appellant's application i.e., I.A. No.1670/2022, and I.A. No.1188/2022, which is filed by the respondent under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of CPC, will be taken up by the learned single judge, in the first instance, on the date already fixed i.e., 07.03.2022, and if, for any reason, it is not possible to take up these applications on the said date, the same will be taken up on a date which is proximate to the given date.

(iiia) Once the learned single judge has taken a view qua the aforementioned applications, he will, then, deal with the respondent's application i.e., I.A. No.1795/2022, which has been filed, as noticed above, under Order XXXIX Rule 2A of CPC.

3.1. It is ordered accordingly.

4. It is made clear that nothing stated hereinabove will impact the decision in any of the applications, referred to hereinabove, which are pending consideration before the learned single judge.

5. Consequently, pending applications shall stand closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top