SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER, JASMEET SINGH
Dibban Lal Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. re-employment not guaranteed post superannuation. (Para 1 , 2)
2. tribunal upheld respondents' decision on suitability. (Para 3 , 4)
3. no entitlement to emoluments for non-re-employment. (Para 5 , 6)
4. writ petition dismissed. (Para 7 , 9)
5. suggestion for re-employment policy noted. (Para 8)

JUDGMENT

[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (As per request)]

Rajiv Shakdher, J. (ORAL):--This is a writ petition directed against the order dated 06.01.2020, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal [in short "the Tribunal"] in O.A. No. 3663/2019.

2. This was the second round of litigation for the petitioner before the Tribunal.

2.1. In the first round, by the time the petitioner's O.A. was taken up for final hearing by the Tribunal the two year period accorded for re-employment (albeit after superannuation) had already elapsed. To be noted, the petitioner superannuated at the age of 60 on 30.06.2016. That O.A. was registered as O.A. No. 846/2017, and was disposed of via order dated 22.05.2019. At that point in time, the petitioner had indicated to the Tribunal that although he was not looking for re-employment since the two year period for which he could be re-employed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top