SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Sudhir Kumar Jain, JJ.
Abinash Kumar - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 5186 of 2022 & CM Appl. 15393 of 2022
Decided On : 29-03-2022




Court affirmed entitlement to pro-rata pension for all central government employees, rejecting discrimination against non-commissioned officers.

Headnote:(A) Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Notification No. 8 (3) 86/A/D (Pension/Services) dated 19.02.1987 - Petitioners, discharged Air Force personnel, challenged the constitutionality of a notification denying pro-rata pension to non-commissioned officers - Court affirmed that all central government employees are entitled to pro-rata pension under existing rules - Petition disposed with directions to release the pension if eligible, referencing judgments in W.P.

(C) No. 10026/2019 and W.P

(C) 9905/2019 (Paras 1-5).

(B) Legal Principle - The principle of equality underlines pension entitlements, establishing that all qualifying employees should not be discriminated against based on rank.

(C) Issue of the case - The critical question was the constitutionality of the notification limiting pro-rata pension benefits solely to commissioned officers.

(D) Findings of Court - The court held that the respondents must consider and grant pro-rata pension based on eligibility and previous judgments, reinforcing rights of discharged personnel. (E) Ratio Decidendi - The court emphasized the necessity for fairness in pension allocation, particularly regarding applications by non-commissioned officers. (F) Result - Petition disposed of with directions for release of pension.

Table of Content
1. unconstitutionality of selective pension benefits. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. entitlement to pro-rata pension for all government employees. (Para 4)
3. court's directive for consideration of pension eligibility. (Para 5)
4. disposition of the case. (Para 6)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The present petition has been preferred seeking a declaration that Clause No.1 of Notification No. 8 (3) 86/A/D (Pension/Services) issued by Government of India, Ministry of Defence dated 19.02.1987 is Unconstitutional, ultra vires, void, illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, discriminatory and unsustainable, as the same extends benefits of pro-rata pension to only commissioned officers of defence service. In addition, quashing of letters dated 17.05.2021 & 05.10.2021 issued by the respondents is also sought.

2. Petitioner No.1 claims to have joined the services of the Indian Air Force as an Airman in December, 2006. He was discharged from the services of Indian Air Force vide Order No. RO/2503/1/RW (Dis) dated 10.10.2019 on civil post grounds and thereafter, he joined University of Bihar on the post of Assistant Professor (Political Science). He claims to have applied for grant of pro rata pension with arrears on 04.02.2021 to the respondents. However, the said representation was rejected by the respondents vide its letter dated 17.05.2021.

3. Petitioner No.2 claims to have joined the services of the Indian Air Force as an Airman on 27.06.2006. He was discharged from the services of Indian Air Force on 08.07.2016 and joined the services in IDBI Bank, JNIBF, Hyderabad as Assistant Manager Grade `A'. Petitioner No.2 also claims to have made a representation on 31.07.2021 to the respondents for grant pro-rata pension, which was rejected by the respondents vide reply dated 05.10.2021.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that by virtue of Notification no. 28/30/2004-P & PW (B) dated 26.05.2005 and in terms with Rule 37 of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, all employees of Central Government are entitled to grant of pro-rata pension. Further submits that in view of judgment dated 09.01.2019 in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2019, which is upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, respondents be directed to grant pro-rata pension with arrears to the petitioners for their past services in Air Force.

5. Upon hearing, we dispose of the present petition with direction to respondents to consider the case of petitioners and release pro-rata pension, if found eligible, with appropriate interest in terms of judgment dated 09.01.2019 in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2019 and judgment dated 08.02.2021 in W.P (C) 9905/2019 passed by this Court.

6. With directions as aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of. Pending application is disposed of as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top