Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
ANU MALHOTRA
Satish Sachiv Baba – Appellant
Versus
CPWD (M.R.D.) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for reinstatement and review of termination. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. review of enquiry validity and participation. (Para 4 , 5 , 7) |
| 3. discussion of procedural history and relevance of evidence. (Para 6 , 10 , 12) |
| 4. petitioner's claims regarding procedural unfairness. (Para 8 , 9 , 13) |
| 5. legal standards and expectations in disciplinary procedures. (Para 11 , 14 , 21) |
| 6. conclusions regarding disciplinary findings and evidence. (Para 15 , 18 , 19) |
| 7. assessment of judicial review limits in disciplinary matters. (Para 22 , 24 , 34) |
| 8. final judgment on the dismissal of the petition. (Para 39 , 40) |
JUDGMENT
Anu Malhotra, J. The petitioner, vide the present petition seeks the setting aside of the impugned judgment/order dated 20.10.2020 of the Presiding Officer, Labour Court-XIX, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in LIR No.213 of 2006/LIR No.221 of 2010/Unique Case I.D.No.02402C0042922002 titled as "Sh. Satish Sachiv Baba Vs. C.P.W.D. (M.R.D.)" and also seeks the issuance of a writ of certiorari against the order dated 08.03.2000 of the Executive Engineer, PWD Division, whereby, the services of the petitioner had been terminated apart from a prayer made by the petitioner seek
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
