SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Virender Beniwal – Appellant
Versus
North Delhi Municipal Corporation – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks relief against unauthorized construction. (Para 2 , 3)
2. assurances of assistance from authorities. (Para 4 , 7 , 9)
3. details of prior legal actions regarding construction. (Para 5 , 6)
4. court emphasizes duty of respondents to act. (Para 10 , 11)
5. petition disposed, no further orders required. (Para 12)

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. (Oral)--Present none for respondent No.3.

2. By way of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought the following reliefs:

    "a) call for the complete relevant records from Respondent Nos.1 and 2 pertaining to the Complaints made by Petitioner regarding the illegal and unauthorised constructions being carried out by the Respondent No.2 at property bearing Khasra No.412, Shree Sukhlal Market, Pitampura Village, Delhi-110034 including the action taken report and records of Unauthorised Construction File No.186 & 187 dated 22.05.2015;

    b) direct the Respondent Nos.1 and 2 to demolish and remove the illegal and unauthorised constructions being carried out by the Respondent No.3 at property bearing Khasra No.412, Shree Sukhlal Market, Pitampura Village, Delhi-110034

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top