SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Sachin Kumar Verma – Appellant
Versus
South Delhi Municipal Corporation – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner's ownership and claims of unauthorized construction. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court's examination of demolition actions taken. (Para 4 , 7 , 8)
3. allegations of further illegal construction after demolition. (Para 5 , 6)
4. court's decision to dispose of the petition. (Para 10 , 11)

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. (Oral)--By way of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks directions to respondent No.1 to take action against illegal and unauthorized construction allegedly carried out at the roof of shop Nos.1 to 5 forming part of Khasra No.152, IGNOU Road, Near Bikaner Choice, Paryavaran Complex Saidulajab, New Delhi (hereinafter, referred to as the `subject property'). The petitioner claims to be the owner of shop No.1 at the subject property.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that shop No.1 forming part of the subject property was initially owned by his mother, who expired on 29.01.2021. As a result, ownership of shop No.1 is stated to have devolved upon him. The petitioner has alleged that in January, 2021, respondent Nos. 3 to 5, who are owners/builder of shop Nos. 1 to 5 forming part of the subject p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top