SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Dinesh Kumar Sharma, JJ.
Smart Cube India Pvt. Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax - Respondent
W.P.(C) 6365 of 2022 & CM Appls. 19227-19228 of 2022
Decided On : 21-04-2022




An assessment order finalized without allowing objections to a draft constitutes a jurisdictional defect, rendering the order invalid.

Headnote:(A) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143(3), 254, 156, 274/271(1)(c), and 144C - Challenge to assessment order made without allowing the petitioner to file objections before the Dispute Resolution Panel, deemed invalid for lack of jurisdiction. (Paras 1-3)

(B) Jurisdiction and Procedural Validity - Assessment order finalized without forwarding a draft assessment order constitutes an incurable defect rendering it a nullity, reaffirmed by precedent. (Paras 2-3)

Facts of the case:
The writ petition contests an assessment order for the assessment year 2011-12, which assessed the petitioner's income at Rs.3,29,33,145/-, contending that it was passed without jurisdiction.

Findings of Court:
The assessment order, demand notice, and penalty notice are stayed pending further orders.

Issues: The primary issues addressed include the jurisdiction of the assessment and the procedure required under Section 144C.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the inability to file objections against the draft assessment order invalidates the final assessment, emphasizing the procedural requirements set forth in the Act.

Result: The impugned orders are stayed.

Table of Content
1. challenge to the assessment order (Para 1)
2. arguments on illegality and nullity of assessment (Para 2 , 3)
3. scheduling further proceedings (Para 4 , 5)
4. staying the impugned orders (Para 6)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--Present writ petition has been filed challenging the assessment order dated 30th March, 2022 passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 254, notice of demand issued under Section 156 and penalty notice issued under Section 274/271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short `the Act') all dated 30th March, 2022 for the assessment year 2011-12.

2. Learned senior counsel for the Petitioner states that the Respondent passed the impugned assessment order under Section 143(3) read with Section 254 of the Act assessing the income of the Petitioner at Rs.3,29,33,145/-. He states that the impugned order passed by the Respondent illegally deprived the Petitioner of the option to file objections against the draft assessment order before the Dispute Resolution Panel (`DRP') as provided under Section 144C of the Act and is, therefore, wholly without jurisdiction and invalid.

3. Learned senior counsel for the Petitioner states that the Respondent has finalized assessment without first forwarding a draft of the proposed order of assessment which is an incurable defect rendering the assessment order a nullity, as repeatedly held by this Court in various decisions, including in Turner International India (P.) Ltd., [2017]398 ITR 177 (Del), JCB India Ltd., [2017]398 ITR 189 (Del) and Pr. CIT Vs. Headstrong Services India (P.) Ltd., [2021]278 Taxman 224 (Delhi).

4. Issue notice. Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent. He states that connected matters are listed before this Court on 10th October, 2022.

5. Accordingly, list the matter on 10th October, 2022.

6. Till further orders, the impugned assessment order, demand notice and penalty notice are stayed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top