MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Srf Ltd – Appellant
Versus
National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J.:-- (Oral)
CM Appl. 20376/2021 (exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 6484/2021& CM Appl. 20375/2021
3. Present petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.
4. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the final assessment order dated 30th June, 2021 passed under Section 143(3) read with Sections 144C(3) and 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [‘the Act’] and the demand notice of Rs. 56,76,09,018/- issued under Section 156 of the Act for the Assessment Year 2017-18. Petitioner also seeks directions to the Respondents not to take any action or initiate further proceedings in furtherance of the impugned assessment order and demand notice.
5. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that vide draft assessment order dated 05th May, 2021 issued under Section 144C(1) of the Act, the total income of the Petitioner was proposed at Rs. 450,02,37,902/-. He points out that under section 144C(2), the Petitioner had thirty days (30 days) to file objections to Dispute Resolution Panel [DRP] against the draft order, i.e. by 04thJune 2021.
6. He emphasises that since the office of Petitioner
The court emphasized the importance of complying with time limits and the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer to pass assessments in conformity with the directions of the Dispute Resolution Panel.
Jurisdiction to issue assessment orders is invalid if objections are pending with the Dispute Resolution Panel; proper compliance with procedures outlined in tax legislation is essential for lawful a....
Violation of mandatory procedure under Section 144C of the Income Tax Act and a circular issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes led to the setting aside of the Assessment Order and restoration o....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of adhering to statutory procedures and timelines in the assessment process under the Income Tax Act.
A taxpayer must file objections to proposed tax assessments with both the Dispute Resolution Panel and Assessing Officer for effective challenge under the Income Tax Act.
An assessment order finalized without allowing objections to a draft constitutes a jurisdictional defect, rendering the order invalid.
The assessment order is to be passed only after considering the reply of the assessee as per Section 144B(1)(xxiv) of the Income Tax Act, and failure to do so constitutes a violation of the mandatory....
The court established that a final assessment order cannot be issued without awaiting directions from the Dispute Resolution Panel when objections have been timely filed.
The failure to provide adequate opportunity to respond in tax assessment proceedings constitutes a violation of natural justice, necessitating the quashing of the assessment order.
Violation of the principle of natural justice due to lack of reasonable time to file objections to the reasons furnished by the Respondents
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.