SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 1088

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Srf Ltd - Appellant
Versus
National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi & Anr. - Respondents
W.P.(C) 6484/2021
Decided On : 14-07-2021

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Satyen Sethi, Advocate with Mr. Arta Trana Panda, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocate, for the Respondents

The court emphasized the importance of complying with time limits and the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer to pass assessments in conformity with the directions of the Dispute Resolution Panel.

Headnote:

Income Tax Act - Assessment Order - The court quashed the final assessment order and demand notice issued under the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2017-18, and remitted the matter to the Dispute Resolution Panel for consideration.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner challenged the final assessment order and demand notice issued under the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2017-18, citing inability to file objections within the specified time due to lockdown and reliance on circulars providing relaxation in time limits.

Finding of the Court:

The court quashed the final assessment order and demand notice, and remitted the matter to the Dispute Resolution Panel for consideration under the Income Tax Act.

Issues: Challenge to final assessment order and demand notice, reliance on circulars providing relaxation in time limits, jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer to pass the impugned assessment.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner's objections to the draft assessment order were filed within the extended time limit provided by circulars, and the Assessing Officer had no jurisdiction to pass the impugned assessment without considering the directions of the Dispute Resolution Panel.

Final Decision: The final assessment order and demand notice were quashed, and the matter was remitted to the Dispute Resolution Panel for consideration under the Income Tax Act.

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J.:-- (Oral)

CM Appl. 20376/2021 (exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 6484/2021& CM Appl. 20375/2021

3. Present petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.

4. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the final assessment order dated 30th June, 2021 passed under Section 143(3) read with Sections 144C(3) and 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [‘the Act’] and the demand notice of Rs. 56,76,09,018/- issued under Section 156 of the Act for the Assessment Year 2017-18. Petitioner also seeks directions to the Respondents not to take any action or initiate further proceedings in furtherance of the impugned assessment order and demand notice.

5. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that vide draft assessment order dated 05th May, 2021 issued under Section 144C(1) of the Act, the total income of the Petitioner was proposed at Rs. 450,02,37,902/-. He points out that under section 144C(2), the Petitioner had thirty days (30 days) to file objections to Dispute Resolution Panel [DRP] against the draft order, i.e. by 04thJune 2021.

6. He emphasises that since the office of Petitioner was closed due to lockdown in Delhi, therefore, objections to the draft order could not be filed within thirty days (30 days) of receipt of the draft order, i.e. by 04 th June, 2021 and were filed on 21stJune, 2021.

7. He points out that the CBDT by Circular No.12 of 2021 and Notification No.74/2021 dated 25 th June 2021 provided relaxation in respect of time limits of certain compliances and vide para 1 of the circular, time limit to file objections to DRP, where the same were to be filed by 01st June 2021 or thereafter were extended to 31st August, 2021 and the time limit for completion of assessment was extended to 30thSeptember 2021.

8. He states that in view of Circular No.12 of 2021 dated 25 th June 2021, the objections under section 144(2) of the Act to the draft order dated 05th May 2021, filed on 21stJune 2021 were within time.

9. He points out that the Respondent No.1 erred in considering that the Petitioner had opted not to file objections to the draft order dated 05 th May, 2021 and in complete ignorance of the time limits extended by Circular No. 12/2021 and Notification No.74/2021 both dated 25th June 2021, passed the impugned assessment order dated 30thJune 2021 under section 143(3) read with sections 144C(3) and 144B of the Act and thereby, assessed the total income at Rs.450,02,37,902/- and raised a demand of Rs.56,76,09,018/- vide demand notice issued under section 156 of the Act.

10. He contends that since the objections to draft assessment order dated 05 thMay 2021 were filed and the same were pending disposal with the DRP, the Respondent No.1 had no jurisdiction to pass the impugned assessment under Section 143(3) read with section 144C (3). He emphasises that the mandate of Section 144C(13) of the Act is that on receipt of the directions of DRP under section 144C(5) of the Act, the Assessing Officer (Respondent No.1 herein) shall complete the assessment in conformity with the directions of the DRP which was not done in the present case.

11. Issue notice. Ms, Vibhooti Malhotra accepts notice on behalf of respondents. She states that in view of the facts of the present case, she has no objection if the present matter is remitted to the DRP.

12. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the final assessment order dated 30th June, 2021 as well as the demand notice of Rs. 56,76,09,018/- (Rupees Fifty Six Crores Seventy Six Lakhs Nine Thousand and Eighteen only) issued under Section 156 of the Act for the assessment year 2017-18 is quashed and the matter is remitted to the DRP for consideration under Section 144(C) of the Act. Thereafter, the assessment order shall be passed in accordance with the procedure stipulated under Section 144B(1) (xxix) to (xxxi) as well as Section 144(C) of the Act.

13. Accordingly, the present writ petition along with pen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top