Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Subros Educational Society – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. registration denial for similar marks. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. existing s.b.s marks and expansion intention. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. order set aside; re-evaluation mandated. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. appeal allowed and matter disposed. (Para 8 , 9) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The Appellant - M/S. SUBROS EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY has filed the present appeal challenging the impugned order dated 15th February, 2019 passed by the Senior Examiner, Registrar of Trademarks, New Delhi by which the mark `SBS World School' has been refused registration. The mark has been refused registration under Section 11(1)(a) and 11(1)(b) of the Trademarks Act, 1999 on the ground of similar marks, which are existing in the Register. The operative portion of the order dated 15th February, 2019 is set out below:
"With reference to the above and request on Form TM-M dated 09/02/2019. It has been decided by the Registrar of Trademarks to inform you that hearing in respect of above application was held on 26/12/2018 and the said application is refused on the following Grounds:
* The applicant advocate Ranjan Jha appeared. I have heard the argument and also
Registration of a trademark may be refused if similar existing marks are present unless prior registrations are adequately considered.
The court emphasized that existing trademarks and their reputation must be considered when assessing the registration of similar marks, highlighting the importance of established goodwill.
A trademark may acquire distinctiveness through extensive use, enabling registration even if it includes common terms, preventing undue blocking of competition.
Trademark registrations cannot be denied based on similarity when prior registrations exist, and the use of national symbols must be considered permissible if no objection is provided by relevant aut....
Trademark applications can be rejected for descriptiveness and similarity to existing marks, but distinct logos may be registered if they demonstrate unique visual representation.
A trade mark application can proceed for advertisement as 'proposed to be used' despite initial user evidence claims being unproven, provided objections regarding similarity are evaluated appropriate....
Initially rejected trademark application for being non-distinctive was deemed unsustainable due to prior registrations and a no-objection from authorities, clarifying that the outline of a national s....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the Registrar to consider evidence and submissions, as well as the status of cited marks and the dissimilarity of goods and ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
