IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Subros Educational Society - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
C.A. (COMM.IPD-TM) 1 of 2021
Decided On : 19-05-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. trademark application details and history. (Para 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. court's reasoning on the unsustainability of the refusal. (Para 6) |
| 3. order for proceeding with trademark registration. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The Appellant - M/S. SUBROS EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, has filed the present appeal challenging the impugned order dated 15th February, 2019 passed by the Senior Examiner, Registrar of Trademarks, New Delhi. By the said order, the mark `Step By Step High School', applied for by the Appellant, vide Trademark Application bearing No.2891488 in Class 41, has been refused registration, under Sections 9 & 11 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. The operative portion of the order dated 15th February, 2019 is set out below:
"With reference to the above and request on Form TM-M dated 09/02/2019. It has been decided by the Registrar of Trademarks to inform you that hearing in respect of above application was held on 26/12/2018 and the said application is refused on the following Grounds:
* The applicant advocate Ranjan Jha appeared. I have heard the argument and also perused the documents available on record. The same and similar mark is already on record, hence, objection under Section 9 and 11 is sustained, application is refused for registration."
3. The details of the trademark Application bearing No.2891488 in Class 41 relating to the mark `Step By Step High School' is set out below:

4. A perusal of the above order shows that the same is for `Step By Step High School', which is a variant of the Appellant's registered trademark. The Appellant has several similar registrations, such as "Step By Step" bearing No.1301297, as well as "Step By Step School" bearing No. 1549619.
5. The mark `Step By Step' has been used by the Appellant in respect of educational services since the year 1990. The said mark has been used as a name of the play school as also higher levels of schooling and has acquired goodwill and reputation. It is submitted by Mr. Bhasin, ld. Counsel for the Appellant that in view of the expansion of its branches in other fields of educational services, the mark "Step By Step High School" was applied for.
6. Accordingly, the rejection of the said mark, in the face of the earlier registrations in the name of the Appellant for the mark `Step by Step', as also the long user, is unsustainable. The impugned order dated 15th February, 2019 is, accordingly, set aside.
7. The application bearing No.2891488 for the registration of the mark `Step By Step High School' shall proceed for advertisement in the trademark journal. The said mark shall be advertised within a period of four months. If there is any opposition to the said trademark application, the opposition shall be decided in accordance with law, without being effected by any of the observations made in the present order.
8. Let the present order be served upon the Respondent - Registrar of Trademarks, New Delhi, through Mr, Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, ld. CGSC.
9. The present appeal is allowed and disposed of, in the above terms. All pending applications are also disposed of.
The court emphasized that existing trademarks and their reputation must be considered when assessing the registration of similar marks, highlighting the importance of established goodwill.
Registration of a trademark may be refused if similar existing marks are present unless prior registrations are adequately considered.
Trademark registrations cannot be denied based on similarity when prior registrations exist, and the use of national symbols must be considered permissible if no objection is provided by relevant aut....
The use of the outline of the map of India as a trademark is not violative of Section 9 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 or the Emblems and Name (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950.
Initially rejected trademark application for being non-distinctive was deemed unsustainable due to prior registrations and a no-objection from authorities, clarifying that the outline of a national s....
A trademark may acquire distinctiveness through extensive use, enabling registration even if it includes common terms, preventing undue blocking of competition.
Trademark applications can be rejected for descriptiveness and similarity to existing marks, but distinct logos may be registered if they demonstrate unique visual representation.
The main legal point established is that the rejection of a trademark application based on lack of distinctiveness should be supported by sustainable facts and law, and the applicant should be given ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.