SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ASHA MENON
Vijay Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Table of Content
1. factual background of property dispute (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 12 , 13)
2. arguments on forgery and liability (Para 7 , 8)
3. court's analysis on framing of charges (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 14 , 15 , 16)
4. final decision on merits (Para 17 , 18)

JUDGMENT

1. This petition has been filed under Sections 397, 401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, "Cr.P.C.") seeking the quashing of orders dated 6th August, 2020 and 11th March, 2022, passed by the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Saket District Court, Delhi (for short, "learned Trial Court"), in the case relating to FIR No.422/2001, registered at Police Station New Friends Colony, Delhi under Sections 201/406/420/448/467/471/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, "IPC").

2. The FIR was registered by Naresh Kumar Pandey against the accused persons, being V.K. Jain and his sons, namely, Saurab Jain, Gaurav Jain and Manav Jain, the MCD officials, namely, Om Dutt Sharma and MMS Bhatnagar. Though the FIR had been also registered against K.C. Pandey, who was the brother of the complainant, charge-sheet was not filed against him as he expired on 15th February, 2003.

3.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top