SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Merta Investment Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Vice Chairman Delhi Development Authority – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Subramonium Prasad, J. The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, challenging impugned Order dated 14.07.2021 passed by the Director (Old Scheme Branch), Delhi Development Authority (Respondent No.2 herein) wherein the Petitioner's request for allotment of Plot. No. 58, Pocket P, EPDP Colony, C.R. Park, New Delhi-110019 (hereinafter, "the demised plot") at 85% of the his Bid was rejected and allotment was cancelled.

2. The facts, in brief, leading up to the filing of the instant writ petition are as follows:

a) It is stated that on 01.06.2019, the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) had issued an advertisement pertaining to the e-auction of properties. Consequently, the Petitioner placed its bid in pursuance of the e-auction on 25.06.2019, and on 26.06.2019, the Petitioner was declared to be the Highest Bidder (H1) with respect to the demised plot.

b) The demised plot was inspected by an architect hired by the Petitioner and it was found that the actual area of the same (106.55 sq. mtr.) was lesser than the area notified by the DDA (139.07 sq. mtr.). The Petitioner wrote to the DDA on 19.08.2019 requesting a verification

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top