Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. vs Dhampur Sugar Mills

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER, TARA VITASTA GANJU
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Dhampur Sugar Mills – Respondent

Table of Content
1. appeal against single judge's judgment (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. appellant's claim for damages based on clause 3 (Para 4 , 5)
3. injury pleading concerning supply deficiency (Para 6 , 7)
4. respondent's contention on pleading damages (Para 8)
5. components required for claiming damages (Para 10 , 11)
6. total damages awarded to respondent (Para 12)
7. judgment dismissal and cost allocation (Para 14 , 15 , 16)

JUDGMENT

Rajiv Shakdher, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. 23414/2022

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

FAO (OS) (COMM) 125/2022 and CM APPL. 23413/2022[Application filed on behalf of the appellant seeking stay on operation/implementation of the order/judgement dated 06.01.2022.]

2. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned single judge dated 06.01.2022.

3. The learned single judge, via the impugned judgment, has set aside the award dated 23.08.2012 rendered by the sole arbitrator.

3.1. To be noted, the sole arbitrator was, admittedly, appointed by the appellant.

4. Mr Sunil Dalal, learned senior counsel, who appears on behalf of the appellant, confines his challenge to one issue, which is, that the learned single judge has, according to him, wrongly se

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTRAJIV SHAKDHER, TARA VITASTA GANJUHindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. – AppellantVersusDhampur Sugar Mills – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER, TARA VITASTA GANJU
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Dhampur Sugar Mills – Respondent