SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Jyoti Singh, Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, JJ.
K. Rakesh Shankar Dayal - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 9497 of 2022
Decided On : 13-06-2022




Interim relief in administrative matters cannot equate to granting final relief, as established by the court in this case.

Headnote:(A) Administrative Law - No specific statutes or sections cited - Writ petition challenging the transfer order of a government employee - The Tribunal denied interim relief to stay the transfer order, which had already taken effect. (Paras 4-6)

(B) Interim Relief - The court affirmed that interim relief cannot equate to final relief, emphasizing the nature of the requested relief in administrative matters. (Paras 6-10)

Facts of the case:
The writ petition was filed challenging a transfer order which was implemented on 25.03.2022. The Tribunal denied interim relief based on the transfer already being in effect and the nature of relief sought by the petitioner. (Paras 3-5)

Findings of Court:
The court found no infirmity in the Tribunal's decision, acknowledging that granting the relief sought would effectively be granting final relief ahead of trial. Moreover, the court allowed the petitioner 6 weeks to join the new posting. (Paras 6-9)

Issues: The main issues addressed included the appropriateness of granting interim relief regarding a transfer that had already taken effect and the authority of the Tribunal in doing so. (Paras 5-6)

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the relief sought could not be granted as interim relief, reaffirming that interim measures should not provide the essence of final relief as a principle of administrative law. (Paras 6-10)

Result: Writ petition disposed of, with directions given for joining the new post. (Paras 6-12)

Table of Content
1. legal context of transfer order and interim relief. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
2. interim relief cannot be granted as final relief. (Para 6)
3. consideration for time extension and salary issues. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. finalization of the petition and application. (Para 12 , 13)

JUDGMENT

Jyoti Singh, J. (ORAL)

CM APPL. 28354/2022 (Exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 9497/2022 & C.M. APPL. 28353/2022 (Stay)

3. Present writ petition has been filed assailing the order dated 25.05.2022, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, in O.A. No.1301/2022.

4. The learned Tribunal vide the impugned order has declined to grant interim relief staying the operation of the transfer order dated 25.03.2022, on the ground that Petitioner stood relieved on the same day and cancellation of the transfer order as an interim relief would amount to granting a final relief in the Original Application.

5. The transfer order dated 25.03.2022, impugned before the learned Tribunal was challenged by the Petitioner much after the same had taken effect relieving the Petitioner from the current place of posting. Since the transfer order had taken effect, the learned Tribunal rightly held that the adjudication would now be with respect to the legality or otherwise of the transfer order and the relief of cancellation of the transfer order could not be granted as an interim relief.

6. We find no infirmity in order of the learned Tribunal. The main relief sought in the Original Application filed before the learned Tribunal is for quashing and cancellation of the impugned transfer order and as per settled law, the said relief cannot be granted by way of an interim relief as that would amount to allowing the final relief in the Original Application.

7. At this stage, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submits that Petitioner has undergone a surgery and has health related issues, on account of which he is not in a position to join his new place of posting, i.e., Secretariat, Port Blair and requests some time for joining.

8. Having heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Central Government Standing Counsel for the Respondents, we are inclined to accede to this request of the Petitioner and accordingly, Petitioner is granted a period of 6 weeks from today to join his new place of posting as aforementioned.

9. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner undertakes that Petitioner shall join the new place of posting on or before the expiry of 6 weeks period granted by this Court.

10. Learned counsel also submits that Petitioner's salary from the date of the impugned transfer order till date has not been paid. It is not for this Court to enter into the dispute related to salary of the Petitioner, as that is not the subject matter of the present petition. We are, however, sanguine that the Respondents will take a compassionate and liberal view with respect to payment of the arrears of salary to the Petitioner.

11. At request of the learned counsel for the Petitioner, we grant liberty to the Petitioner to file an application for early hearing of O.A. No.1301/2022 which is next listed on 17.08.2022 before the learned Tribunal.

12. Writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

13. Pending application also stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top