IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Jyoti Singh, Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, JJ.
K. Rakesh Shankar Dayal - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 9497 of 2022
Decided On : 13-06-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. legal context of transfer order and interim relief. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. interim relief cannot be granted as final relief. (Para 6) |
| 3. consideration for time extension and salary issues. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. finalization of the petition and application. (Para 12 , 13) |
JUDGMENT
Jyoti Singh, J. (ORAL)
CM APPL. 28354/2022 (Exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 9497/2022 & C.M. APPL. 28353/2022 (Stay)
3. Present writ petition has been filed assailing the order dated 25.05.2022, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, in O.A. No.1301/2022.
4. The learned Tribunal vide the impugned order has declined to grant interim relief staying the operation of the transfer order dated 25.03.2022, on the ground that Petitioner stood relieved on the same day and cancellation of the transfer order as an interim relief would amount to granting a final relief in the Original Application.
5. The transfer order dated 25.03.2022, impugned before the learned Tribunal was challenged by the Petitioner much after the same had taken effect relieving the Petitioner from the current place of posting. Since the transfer order had taken effect, the learned Tribunal rightly held that the adjudication would now be with respect to the legality or otherwise of the transfer order and the relief of cancellation of the transfer order could not be granted as an interim relief.
6. We find no infirmity in order of the learned Tribunal. The main relief sought in the Original Application filed before the learned Tribunal is for quashing and cancellation of the impugned transfer order and as per settled law, the said relief cannot be granted by way of an interim relief as that would amount to allowing the final relief in the Original Application.
7. At this stage, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submits that Petitioner has undergone a surgery and has health related issues, on account of which he is not in a position to join his new place of posting, i.e., Secretariat, Port Blair and requests some time for joining.
8. Having heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Central Government Standing Counsel for the Respondents, we are inclined to accede to this request of the Petitioner and accordingly, Petitioner is granted a period of 6 weeks from today to join his new place of posting as aforementioned.
9. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner undertakes that Petitioner shall join the new place of posting on or before the expiry of 6 weeks period granted by this Court.
10. Learned counsel also submits that Petitioner's salary from the date of the impugned transfer order till date has not been paid. It is not for this Court to enter into the dispute related to salary of the Petitioner, as that is not the subject matter of the present petition. We are, however, sanguine that the Respondents will take a compassionate and liberal view with respect to payment of the arrears of salary to the Petitioner.
11. At request of the learned counsel for the Petitioner, we grant liberty to the Petitioner to file an application for early hearing of O.A. No.1301/2022 which is next listed on 17.08.2022 before the learned Tribunal.
12. Writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
13. Pending application also stands disposed of.
Interim relief in administrative matters cannot equate to granting final relief, as established by the court in this case.
The importance of the final decision being made by the Central Administrative Tribunal without being influenced by any observation made in the contempt proceedings.
The necessity for administrative actions, such as transfers, must be continually justified, and changes in circumstances can invalidate previously valid orders.
The court upheld that while transfers are necessary for administrative efficiency, they must comply with established policies regarding tenure at postings.
Quashing transfer order does not automatically invalidate disciplinary action for unauthorised absence; employee must join despite challenge absent stay – absence period regularized as qualifying ser....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.