SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
JYOTI SINGH, ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
K. Rakesh Shankar Dayal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. legal context of transfer order and interim relief. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
2. interim relief cannot be granted as final relief. (Para 6)
3. consideration for time extension and salary issues. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. finalization of the petition and application. (Para 12 , 13)

JUDGMENT

Jyoti Singh, J. (ORAL)

CM APPL. 28354/2022 (Exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 9497/2022 & C.M. APPL. 28353/2022 (Stay)

3. Present writ petition has been filed assailing the order dated 25.05.2022, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, in O.A. No.1301/2022.

4. The learned Tribunal vide the impugned order has declined to grant interim relief staying the operation of the transfer order dated 25.03.2022, on the ground that Petitioner stood relieved on the same day and cancellation of the transfer order as an interim relief would amount to granting a final relief in the Original Application.

5. The transfer order dated 25.03.2022, impugned before the learned Tribunal was challenged by the Petitioner much after the same had taken effect relieving the Petitioner from the current place

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top