Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU
Ircon International Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Reacon Engineers (India) Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed under section 34 of a&c act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondent contests petition's timeliness. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. analysis of filing dates and delays. (Para 5 , 6 , 10 , 15) |
| 4. court's reasoning on validity of filings. (Para 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 5. final dismissal of petition. (Para 16 , 17) |
JUDGMENT
Vibhu Bakhru, J.
1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter `the A&C Act') impugning an arbitral award dated 10.06.2019 (hereinafter `the impugned award') delivered by an Arbitral Tribunal comprising of a Sole Arbitrator (hereinafter `the Arbitral Tribunal').
2. The impugned award was rendered in the context of the disputes that have arisen between the parties in connection with an agreement dated 16.06.2010 (hereinafter `the Agreement').
3. The respondent has opposed the present petition on the ground that it is barred by limitation. The respondent submits that the above- petition has been filed after the expiry of a period of three months from the date of receipt of the impugned award. Further, the petitioner has not filed any application seeking condonation of delay. It is further sub
A petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act must be complete and timely; failure to include required documents leads to dismissal as barred by limitation.
The Court emphasized the importance of due diligence and dispatch in exercising the right to challenge an Arbitral Award within the prescribed time, as per the provisions of the Arbitration Act.
A petition to set aside an arbitral award is barred by limitation if not filed within the prescribed period, and failure to adequately pursue legal remedies undermines the legitimacy of claimed delay....
The judgment established the application of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963, in justifying the delay in filing the application under Section 34 of the A&C Act, and highlighted the discretion o....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the period of limitation under Section 34(3) of the A&C Act refers to three calendar months, and the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation A....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
