SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Mukesh – Appellant
Versus
BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. parties' arguments regarding the right to electricity. (Para 3 , 5 , 9)
2. electricity as a basic amenity. (Para 6)
3. appellant's occupation and claim for electricity connection. (Para 7 , 8)
4. court's directive for installation of electricity connection. (Para 10 , 12 , 14)
5. court's observations on the necessity for electricity supply and implications. (Para 11)

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. (ORAL)

CM APPL. 30179/2022 (Exemption)

1.1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

1.2. The application stands disposed of.

FAO 186/2022, CM APPL. 30180/2022 (Interim Relief) and CM APPL. 30181/2022 (Addl. Doc.)

2.1. By way of the present appeal filed under Order 43 Rule 1 read with Section 151 CPC, the appellant has assailed the order dated 20.06.2022 passed by the learned Vacation Judge/ADJ-01, Patiala House Courts, Delhi in Summer Vacation Case No. 01/2022, whereby the application filed by the appellant/plaintiff under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC was dismissed. The appellant also seeks direction to respondent No.1 to consider and install an electricity meter and connection at the suit property in his favor, upon an application being made by him in this regard.

2.2. Le

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top