SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
REKHA PALLI
Sanjeev Sehgal – Appellant
Versus
Rajendra Kumar B Mohatta – Respondent


Table of Content
1. nature of tenancy and possession dispute. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments regarding tenant's claims and court's recognition. (Para 7 , 8)
3. court's rationale on legal possession termination. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
4. final ruling and costs awarded. (Para 12)

JUDGMENT

Rekha Palli, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. 29665/2022

1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application stands disposed of.

RFA 283/2022

3. The present appeal seeks to assail the judgment and decree dated 27.11.2021 passed by the learned ADJ-03, Patiala House Court, New Delhi in CS No. 294/2020. Under the impugned judgment, the learned Trial Court has decreed the suit of the respondent no.1/plaintiff for possession of property bearing no. 608, Silver Arc Apartments, 22 Firozshah Road, New Delhi.

4. The common case of the parties is that the subject property was given on lease to the respondent no.2/company vide a registered lease deed dated 16.10.2018 on a monthly rent of Rs.2,25,000/- exclusive of water, electricity and maintenance charges. It is the appellant's case that on 05.03.2020, the appellant and the respondent no.2/company entered into a retainership agreement whereunder the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top