B.S Dangwal vs Ashok Tanwar

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
REKHA PALLI
B.S Dangwal – Appellant
Versus
Ashok Tanwar – Respondent

Table of Content
1. application for condonation of delay allowed. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. tenancy dispute over rent and eviction. (Para 4 , 6 , 7)
3. evidence presented in tenancy proceedings. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
4. appellant argues improper jurisdiction. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
5. appellant challenges rent assessment. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
6. court weighs evidence in favor of respondent. (Para 17 , 18 , 19)
7. counterclaim for refund rejected. (Para 20 , 21)
8. appeals dismissed. (Para 22)

JUDGMENT

Rekha Palli, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. 2531/2021-Condonation of delay

1. This is an application filed by the appellant seeking condonation of 40 days delay in re-filing the appeal.

2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 40 days in re-filing the appeal-RFA 42/2021 is condoned.

3. The application stands disposed of.

RFA 42/2021 & CM APPL. 2532/2021

RFA 297/2020 & CM APPL. 31775/2020

4. This common judgment disposes of two appeals being RFA 42/2021 and RFA 297/2020 both preferred by the defendant under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure before the Learned Trial Court. Vide RFA No. 297/2020, the appellant seeks to assail the judgment and decree dated 18.08.202

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTREKHA PALLIB.S Dangwal – AppellantVersusAshok Tanwar – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
REKHA PALLI
B.S Dangwal – Appellant
Versus
Ashok Tanwar – Respondent