Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Jatinder Kumar Wadhwa – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Development Authority – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. tender terms and payment requirements (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 14) |
| 2. details concerning payment timelines and interactions (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 18 , 19) |
| 3. parties' contentions regarding bid cancellation (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 4. court's analysis on payment and communication validity (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 5. ratio decidendi referencing previous case law (Para 38 , 39) |
| 6. final conclusion and orders issued by the court (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43) |
C. Hari Shankar, J.
1. The letter dated 17th May 2022, forming subject matter of challenge in the present petition, preferred by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been issued in the context of a tender, floated by the respondent-DDA for sale of industrial properties by e-auction.
2. The issue in controversy being short, detailed allusion to facts may conveniently be eschewed.
Facts
3. A notice inviting tender for sale of industrial properties by e- auction was issued by the DDA on 27th September 2020. The terms of the bid required prospective bidders to submit 25% of the bid premium in two stages, with 5% to be deposited before par
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
