Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SACHIN DATTA
York Tech Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Development Authority – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks writs against dda's decision. (Para 1) |
| 2. background of e-auction and bid acceptance. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. arguments for petitioner on the contract existence. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. respondent counters with contractual nature. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. court analysis of withdrawal authority. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. limits on arbitrary rejection by public authorities. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 7. justifications for dda's withdrawal analyzed. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 8. petitioner's readiness to comply with bid despite plot size issue. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 9. obligations post-bid acceptance clarified. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 10. consistency with earlier rulings on contract terms. (Para 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 11. implications of loi and tender conditions. (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 12. judicial review parameters and public interest. (Para 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 13. court quashes dda withdrawal and directs compliance. (Para 51 , 52) |
| 14. conclusion of favor for petitioner. (Para 53) |
| 15. final order to allow petition. (Para 54) |
JUDGMENT
Sachin Datta, J.
1. By way of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of Ind
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
