Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Manoj Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations against dpss and requested relief. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. acknowledgment of procedural issues in the petition. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's refusal to grant requested relief. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. writ petition dismissed. (Para 12) |
JUDGMENT
Satish Chandra Sharma, C.J.
C.M. No. 34510/2022
1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. The application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 11634/2022
3. The present Petition has been filed as Public Interest Litigation (PIL) by Mr. Manoj Sharma, against Delhi Public School Society (DPSS) without impleading the DPSS as Respondents.
4. The Petitioner in the Writ Petition has made allegations against the Chairman of the Society - Sh. V.K. Shunglu, and has gone to the extent in saying that the Chairman, DPSS has cheated the Government of India.
5. The Petitioner has also raised a grievance in respect of the elections of the Society, and after alleging mismanagement of the Society, which is registered under the Society Registration Act, 1860, has prayed for the following reliefs:
"(i) Pass an appropriate order/s, direction/s to appoint an administrator who may be a Retired Judge of the Hon'ble Supreme Court
A Public Interest Litigation cannot proceed without impleading necessary parties, and electoral disputes should not be resolved through such mechanisms.
Relief sought in a PIL cannot be granted without hearing the respondents, and election disputes should be addressed in the appropriate forum.
The court emphasized the importance of adhering to the affiliation bye-laws and directed CBSE to take strict action against schools violating these bye-laws.
The main legal point established is that when there is a specific remedy provided under a statute governing the disputes raised before a court of law, no party can be allowed to choose an alternative....
Public Interest Litigations must serve genuine public concerns, not personal grievances, ensuring judicial resources are reserved for cases of true societal impact.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of genuine rival claims or disputes and the need for prima facie material before the Registrar can validly exercise jurisdiction....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
