Parameeta Singh VS Harsh Vardhan Singh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

V. KAMESWAR RAO, ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
Parameeta Singh – Appellant
Versus
Harsh Vardhan Singh – Respondent

Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Vijay Anand Rahi and Mr. Ayodhya Prasad, Advocates
For the Respondent:Mr. Ashok K. Singh, Ms. Ankita Baloni and Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocates

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

V. Kameswar Rao, J.—

CM Appl. 59385/2023

Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of.

CM Appl. 59384/2023

This application is filed by the appellant seeking condonation of delay of 16 days in filing the present appeal. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Application stands disposed of.

Mat.APP.(F.C.) 341/2023

The challenge in this appeal is to an order dated September 13, 2023, whereby the learned Family Court while considering the application filed by the respondent herein under Section 12 of the Guardianship and Wards Act,1890, has directed as under:-

“Ld. Counsel for the respondent states that the respondent is residing at Arunachal Pradesh and she has no objection if the petitioner comes to Arunachal Pradesh to meet the minor child. Ld. Counsel for the respondent further states that the petitioner works in Dubai, therefore, he can not take care of the minor child. Ld. Counsel for the respondent further states that the present petition is filed just to harass the respondent. In rebuttal learned counsel for the petitioner states that the respondent is residing in disturb area of Arunachal Pradesh, th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document