Devasri Bali vs Central Board of Secondry Education

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Devasri Bali – Appellant
Versus
Central Board of Secondry Education – Respondent

Table of Content
1. introduction of the case and relevant parties. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner's arguments regarding assessment scheme. (Para 3 , 4)
3. examination of the doctrine of legitimate expectation. (Para 9 , 10)
4. details of the revised assessment scheme and its implications. (Para 28 , 29)
5. court's ruling and conclusion. (Para 33 , 36 , 38 , 39 , 40)

JUDGMENT

Chandra Dhari Singh, J.

1. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the Petitioner assailing the Class XII Board results declared by the Central Board of Secondary Education (hereinafter referred to as the "CBSE") on 22nd July 2022, praying inter alia as under:

"(a) Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to declare the result of the Petitioner in terms of the Circular No. ACAD-51/21 dated 05.07.2021 factoring in the Special Scheme of Assessment which mandates equal weightage of the theory papers for Term- 1 and Term-2 while computing the result;

(b) Issue a Writ of Certiorari quashing the circular no. CBSE/CE/PPS/2022 dated 23.07.2022 which stipulates 30 percent weightage to Term -1 and 70 percent weightage to Term - 2 for computing the results;"

FACTUAL MAT

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTCHANDRA DHARI SINGHDevasri Bali – AppellantVersusCentral Board of Secondry Education – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Devasri Bali – Appellant
Versus
Central Board of Secondry Education – Respondent