SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Saurabh Banerjee, JJ.
Prahalad Singh - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 12656 of 2022
Decided On : 02-09-2022




Compassionate appointments must be decided timely by the relevant authorities in accordance with established policy.

Headnote:(A) Compassionate Appointment - Policy dated 14.06.2006 - Direction for respondents to decide on representation for compassionate appointment or redeployment - Representation was not decided by respondents since November 2020. (Paras 1, 3)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner requests a compassionate appointment for the son or redeployment to a suitable position in the Railways, having submitted a representation dated 09.11.2020, which remains undecided.

Findings of Court:
The court directed the respondents to take a decision on the representation within six weeks.

Issues: The main issues address the failure of respondents to decide on the representation for compassionate appointment.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the necessity for the respondents to act on the pending representation in accordance with the established policy.

Result: Petition disposed of with direction for prompt decision on the representation.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks compassionate appointment. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court directs decision on representation. (Para 3)
3. petition disposed, liberty to challenge. (Para 4 , 5)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. By way of the present petition, petitioner seeks direction to the respondents to either grant compassionate appointment in Group D to son of the petitioner in place of petitioner or re-deploy the petitioner to any suitable place in the Railways.

2. For the aforesaid relief, petitioner has made representation dated 09.11.2020 which is annexed as Annexure P-6 of the present petition, however, till date, respondents have not decided the same.

3. Accordingly, we hereby dispose of the present petition directing the respondents to take decision on the representation dated 09.11.2020 made by the petitioner in view of the para 4 of the policy dated 14.06.2006 which is annexed as Annexure P-5 of the present petition within six weeks.

4. Needless to state that if the petitioner is still aggrieved, liberty is granted to challenge the same before the appropriate forum.

5. In view of above, petition is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top