SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
Geetika Gulati – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petition filed under constitutional provisions. (Para 1)
2. background of fir registration and court orders. (Para 2)
3. arguments regarding section 497 ipc and fir legality. (Para 3)
4. observations on fir legality and constitutional issues. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
5. clarifications on sections of ipc related to fir. (Para 7 , 8)
6. guidance on exercising inherent jurisdiction by high court. (Para 9)
7. quashing of the fir based on illegality. (Para 10)
8. final order and directive for trial court. (Para 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

The present petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India read with section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as "Cr.P.C.") for quashing of FIR bearing No. 0419/2019 dated 03.10.2019 registered under sections 497/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as the "IPC") at P.S. Dwarka.

2. The respondent no. 2 filed a complaint titled as Chetan Anand v Shaurya Shekhar and Another alongwith an application under section 156(3) Cr.P.C. for registration of FIR against the accused as named in the complaint bearing no. 29173/2018 for commission of offence punishable under sections 497/506/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top