JAVED IQBAL WANI
Khursheed Ahmad Chohan – Appellant
Versus
UT of JK – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The controversy involved in the instant petitions is inter-connected to each other, having been clubbed together pursuant to order dated 29.3.2023, and, as such, are being disposed of by this common judgment.
WP (C) 592/2023
2. The petitioner in the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution implores for the following reliefs:
(b) Respondent No. 2 be directed to constitute a Special Investigation Team (SIT) headed by a gazetted officer and assisted by two senior officers for conducting thorough investigation in the matter, so that interests of justice are met.
(c) In case this Hon'ble Court deems it fit and proper in view of gravity of offences committed as well as the influence that can be exerted by accused persons being police officials, the matter may please be referred to CBI for investigation so that fair and uninfluenced investigation takes place in the matter, in the interests of justice.
3. The facts under the cover of which the aforesaid reliefs are being prayed as stated in the petition are
T.T. Anthony vs. State of Kerala
Lalita Kumari vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others
Ramesh Kumari vs. State (NCT of Delhi) and others
Parkash Singh Badal and another Vs. State of Punjab
Aleque Padamsee and others vs. Union of India and others
Sudhir Bhaskarrao Tambe vs. Hemant Yashwant Dhage and others
Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra and others
Raghubir Saran (Dr.) v. State of Bihar
State of W.B. v. Swapan Kumar Guha
Pepsi Foods Ltd. v. Special Judicial Magistrate
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.