SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, SAURABH BANERJEE
Santosh Kumar (SM GD) – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. reliefs sought by petitioners regarding pension and seniority. (Para 1)
2. court directs final decision on pending relief within four weeks. (Para 2)
3. petitioner no.2 can challenge decisions if aggrieved. (Para 3)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that reliefs sought by the petitioners qua prayer clause (i) for treating the petitioner under the old pension scheme which was applicable till 31.12.2003 at par with their batchmate IRLA No. 12045 AC/GD Mrityunjay Kumar and qua prayer clause (ii) for directing the respondent no.2 to re-fix the seniority of the petitioner in the rank of assistant commandant at par with their batch-mate IRLA No. 12045 AC/GD Mrityunjay Kumar alongwith the consequential benefits qua petitioner nos.1, 3 & 4 have already been satisfied. However, the said reliefs are pending consideration in respect of the petitioner no.2.

2. Accordingly, we hereby dispose of the present petition directing the respondents to take final decision in respect of reliefs sought by petitioner no.2 within four weeks from today. Decision thereof, shall be communicated to the petitioner no.2 within one week thereafter

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top