SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1377

SURESH KUMAR KAIT, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Chaudhary Hitesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Vinod Sharma, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Mukul Singh, CGSC with Ms. Ira Singh, Advocate, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The petitioner in his petition has made following prayers:

    a) To command the respondents to forthwith reinstate the petitioner in service with all consequential benefits including arrears of pay, pay fixation, seniority etc and his suspension, if any, be treated as spent duty for all purposes.

    b) To quash the impugned order dated 24.07.2021 of removal from service passed arbitrarily with mala fide intentions.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that against the appellate Order dated 20.12.2022, the petitioner has filed a revision petition dated 27.01.2023, however, till date the said revision petition has not been decided by the respondents.

3. We hereby dispose of the present petition directing the respondents to take final decision on the revision petition dated 27.01.2023 within four weeks and the decision so taken shall be communicated to the petitioner within one week thereafter.

4. Needless to say that if the petitioner still feels aggrieved by the decision so taken, he may challenge the same before the appropriate forum.

5. The petition is accordingly disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top