Rakesh Chopra vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, SAURABH BANERJEE
Rakesh Chopra – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks multiple reliefs and directives (Para 1 , 1)
2. pending representations require consideration (Para 2)
3. court directs timely decision on representations (Para 3)
4. petition disposed of with pending applications (Para 4)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. By way of the present petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs:

a) Setting aside/Quashing the Impugned order dt. 10.02.2022 passed by the HQ DGBR and;

b) direct Respondents no. 1 to 5 to consider representations dt. 15.02.2022 and 26.08.2022 of the Petitioner in accordance with "OM dt. 31.07.2012, SOP dt. 20.04.2021, OM dt. 14,07,1993, OM dt. 15.02.2010 and consequently allow application for deputation of the Petitioner to NHIDCL and relieve him by granting all necessary approvals and permissions to join on deputation as per relevant rules and laws; and

c) Direct Respondent No, 6 to consider the appointment of Petitioner for the post of Exec. Director in terms of letter dt. 5,07.2022 against `the latest Advt. dt. 01.09.2022 falling vacant due to non-joining of the Petitioner;

d) Direct Respondents No. 1 to 5 to consider all future applications of Petitioner for deputation In accordance with the appl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document