SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, SAURABH BANERJEE
Narender Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. court disposes of the petition and application. (Para 1 , 2 , 7)
2. petitioner seeks to quash office order on compassionate grounds. (Para 3 , 4)
3. respondents must decide on representation within specified time. (Para 5 , 6)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

CM APPL. 35602/2022 (exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

2. The application is accordingly disposed of.

W.P.(C) 11920/2022 & CM APPL. 35601/2022 (ad-interim directions)

3. Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks quashing and setting aside of office order dated 22.06.2022 qua the petitioner, whereby the petitioner was relieved from deputation as JRO to report to his parent organization, being not in line with their own policy; directions to the respondents to further extend the deputation tenure of the petitioner as JRO under respondent No.2 for a period of one year (19.07.2022 to 18.07.2023) on compassionate grounds.

4. For the aforesaid relief, petitioner had made a representation dated 14.07.2022 before the respondents, however, till date the said representation has not been decided.

5. In view of above, we hereby direct the respondents to hear and take a final decision on the representation dated

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top