Rohit Kumar vs State of Himachal Pradesh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(HP) 303

RANJAN SHARMA
Rohit Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Motta.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol.

JUDGMENT :

Ranjan Sharma, J.

Notice. Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.

2. With the consent of the parties, the instant writ petition is taken up for disposal, at this stage, in view of the order(s) intended to be passed herein.

3. The petitioner has filed the instant writ petition, with the following prayers:-

i) “That the respondents may kindly be directed to transfer the petitioner from present place of posting i.e. Government Senior Secondary School Kotighat, Tehsil Kumarsain, District Shimla, H.P. to any one station mentioned in para 5 supra.”

4. The petitioner is a TGT (Non-Medical) and is presently serving in Government Senior Secondary School Kotighat, Tehsil Kumarsain, District Shimla. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is serving at the said station i.e. Government Senior Secondary School Kotighat, Tehsil Kumarsain, District Shimla, since 18.11.2019 initially on contract basis and then after his regularization in April, 2022 till day. The petitioner is also stated to have completed the normal tenure of two winters and three summers in the aforesaid School i.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document