Brij Mohan Rasiwasia vs Butna Devi

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Brij Mohan Rasiwasia – Appellant
Versus
Butna Devi – Respondent

Table of Content
1. introduction and factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. appellant's rebuttal and legal context regarding tenancy. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
3. issues framed and evidence presentation. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25)
4. court's findings on the evidence and conclusions drawn. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31)
5. appellant's grounds for appeal and critique of lower court judgment. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 36 , 37)
6. determination of maintainability and tenant relationship. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45)
7. final decision and dismissal of the suit. (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50)

JUDGMENT

Facts

1. This first appeal, under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), challenges the judgment dated 14th October 2019, passed by the learned Additional District Judge ("the learned ADJ") in CS 15690/16 (Smt. Butna Devi v. Shri Brij Mohan). The appellant was the defendant in the said suit and the respondent was the plaintiff.

The Plaint

2. The respondent, vide CS 15690/16, sought recovery of possession, from the appellant, of the first floor of Property No. XV/8929, Gali No. 1, Multani Dhanda, P

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTC.HARI SHANKARBrij Mohan Rasiwasia – AppellantVersusButna Devi – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Brij Mohan Rasiwasia – Appellant
Versus
Butna Devi – Respondent