Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Rahul Arora – Appellant
Versus
Ashok Chadha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the factual background of the case established tenant's position. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. defendant's arguments on ownership and limitations. (Para 5 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. court's analysis on mesne profits and tenant's obligations. (Para 6 , 8 , 13) |
| 4. the legal standard for adverse possession and ownership disputes. (Para 10 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. concluding orders regarding outstanding payments and timeline for vacating. (Para 17 , 18) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through video conferencing.
2. In the present appeal, the Appellant/Defendant/Tenant (hereinafter "Defendant") assails the judgment dated 31st August, 2019 passed in RCA NO. 82/2018 titled Sh. Rahul Arora v. Sh. Ashok Chadha passed by the ld. ADJ-01, Karkardooma, Delhi (hereinafter "Appellate Court") by which the Appellate Court upheld the decree/ judgment dated 12th April 2018 in C.S. No. 9270/2016 titled Sh. Ashok Chadha v. Sh. Rahul Arora passed by the ld. JSCC/ASCJ/GJ (Shahdra) Karkardooma Courts Delhi (hereinafter "Trial Court").
3. The Trial Court had directed eviction of the Defendant from the shop bearing no. 7/73, Bhim Gali, Vishwas Nagar, Shahdara, Delhi-110032 measuring 60 sq
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
