SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, SAURABH BANERJEE
Karshanbhai Shamlaji Mali – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. quashing of impugned orders (Para 1)
2. conditions for withdrawal of resignation (Para 2)
3. petition dismissed (Para 3)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. Present petition has been filed seeking quashing of the impugned orders dated 31.08.2021 issued by Commandant Medical BSF and 10.09.2021 issued by Dy. Commandant 154 BN BSF and 14.06.2022 issued by the Commandant Medical BSF.

2. It is not in dispute that petitioner has resigned from the service on 08.06.2019 and the same was accepted on 07.08.2019 w.e.f. 31.08.2019. Thereafter petitioner made representations on 02.09.2020, 29.09.2020 and 24.11.2020 for withdrawal of resignation, however, in the said representations, there is no change of circumstances mentioned by the petitioner and the said representations have filed after more than a year which is contrary to CCS CCA Pension Rules as laid down vide OM dated 10.06.2019 wherein it is stated as under:

    "2. The appointing authority may permit a person to withdraw his resignation in the public interest on the condition

    (c) that the period of absence from duty between the date on which the resignation became effective and the date on which the person is allowed to resume duty as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top