SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
GAURANG KANTH
Delhi Jal Board – Appellant
Versus
Its Workmen (Sri Prem Ram) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. writ petition under article 226 challenging an award (Para 1 , 2)
2. factual background of the employment and pay scale dispute (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. arguments by the petitioner regarding pay scale evidence (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
4. arguments by the respondent supporting their entitlement (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
5. court's analysis of jurisdiction under article 226 (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35)
6. findings of the labour court on pay scale entitlement (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40)
7. final judgment dismissing the writ petition (Para 41 , 42)

JUDGMENT

Gaurang Kanth, J. The case at hand is a Writ Petition preferred under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India. Petitioner/Delhi Jal Board in the present case is aggrieved by the Award dated 23.12.2002 passed by the Industrial Tribunal No. III in I.D. No. 126/99 titled M/s Municipal Corporation of Delhi through its Commissioner v. Its Workman Sh. Prem Ram (hereinafter referred to as "impugned award").

2. In the impugned award, learned Labour Court had held the respondent/workman to be entitled to the pay scale of Rs.210-290 (revised from time to time) w.e.f. 02.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top