DELHI HIGH COURT
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Mukta Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Vineet Gupta – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)
CM APPL. 49466/2022 (Exemption)
Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
CM(M) 1243/2022, CM APPL. 49465/2022
1. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 07.10.2022 whereby the objections as to the admissibility of photographs and pen drives have been dismissed by the learned trial court. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that these objections have been dismissed despite court having noted the fact that in the proceeding itself the affidavit filed under Section 65 B of the Indian Evidence Act was not even signed.
2. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that these objections may be kept open to be decided by the learned trial court at the time of final adjudication. In the circumstances, the objections as to the photographs and pen drive as raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner shall remain open to be adjudicated by the learned trial court at the time of final adjudication in accordance with law. However, it is made clear that this court has not gone into the merits of the case.
3. Both the parties shall remain entitled to raise their rival cont
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.