SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Mukta Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Vineet Gupta – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. 49466/2022 (Exemption)

Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.

Application stands disposed of.

CM(M) 1243/2022, CM APPL. 49465/2022

1. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 07.10.2022 whereby the objections as to the admissibility of photographs and pen drives have been dismissed by the learned trial court. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that these objections have been dismissed despite court having noted the fact that in the proceeding itself the affidavit filed under Section 65 B of the Indian Evidence Act was not even signed.

2. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that these objections may be kept open to be decided by the learned trial court at the time of final adjudication. In the circumstances, the objections as to the photographs and pen drive as raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner shall remain open to be adjudicated by the learned trial court at the time of final adjudication in accordance with law. However, it is made clear that this court has not gone into the merits of the case.

3. Both the parties shall remain entitled to raise their rival cont

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top