SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
Umesh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Table of Content
1. overview of the case and fir details. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner's request for further cross-examination. (Para 3 , 4)
3. grounds of appeal against the trial court's decision. (Para 5)
4. discussion on the powers under section 311 cr.p.c. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
5. principles regarding the application of section 311. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
6. court's decision on the petitioner's rights. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
7. conclusion and directives from the court. (Para 15 , 16)

JUDGMENT

Sudhir Kumar Jain, J.

1. The present petition is filed under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 ( hereinafter referred as "Cr.P.C.") against the impugned order dated 16.02.2019 passed by the court of Ms. Sonam Singh, MM (Mahila Court) Central, Tis Hazari, New Delhi (hereinafter referred as "Trial Court") in case titled as State V Umesh Yadav arising out of FIR bearing No. 0011/2014 registered at P.S. Timarpur under sections 354/354A/323/506 Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred as "IPC").

2. The perusal of FIR bearing No. 0011/2014 dated 11.01.2014 reflects that it was registered under sections 354/354A/323/506 IPC on the basis of the complaint made by the complainant "P" pertaining

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top