SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Vijay Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Reserve Bank of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petition filed seeking writs against rbi actions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. petitioner's arguments on lack of evidence and procedural fairness. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
3. respondent's contentions on procedural adequacy and evidence. (Para 15 , 16 , 18 , 19 , 22 , 24 , 25 , 26)
4. court's procedural regulations in disciplinary inquiries. (Para 17 , 20 , 21 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 37)
5. overview of disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner. (Para 28 , 29 , 30)
6. court's engagement with the key legal issues raised. (Para 31 , 32 , 36)
7. judicial review principles governing disciplinary findings. (Para 38 , 39 , 40)
8. limitations of the high court's powers in reviewing evidence. (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48)
9. final conclusion dismissing the petition as meritless. (Para 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63)

JUDGMENT

Chandra Dhari Singh, J.

1. This petition has been filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:

    "(a) issue a writ of certiorari, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, quashing the Enquiry Proceedings and Report against the petitioner;

    (b) issue a writ of certiorari, or

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top