Cambridge Primary School vs Directorate of Education

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Cambridge Primary School – Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Education – Respondent

Table of Content
1. petition filed under article 226 for relief (Para 1 , 2)
2. distinction between terms in pay commission regulations (Para 3 , 4)
3. misapplication of pay fixation norms (Para 5 , 14)
4. respondent's pay entitlement arguments (Para 6 , 7)
5. details of pay revision process and entitlements (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
6. non-compliance consequences and court's directive (Para 12 , 13)
7. equitable principles against unreasonable delay (Para 15)
8. confirmation of pay calculation correctness (Para 16 , 17 , 19)
9. dismissal of the writ petition for lack of merits (Para 20)
10. order for payment compliance (Para 21)

ORDER

Chandra Dhari Singh, J. (Oral)--The instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking inter alia the following reliefs:

(i) "Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, or such other Writ, Order or Direction as deemed proper by this Hon'ble Court, quashing the First Respondent's impugned direction dated 18.07.2009, directing the Petitioner to fix the Second Respondent's basic pay at Rs.6025/-;

(ii) Pass an appropriate direction, declaring that the fixation of the Second Respondent's basic pay at Rs.5850/- as previously calculated b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTCHANDRA DHARI SINGHCambridge Primary School – AppellantVersusDirectorate of Education – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Cambridge Primary School – Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Education – Respondent